
Answer-first summary for fast verification
Answer: Ensuring that sufficient collateral is posted by counterparties
The correct answer to the question is A: Ensuring that sufficient collateral is posted by counterparties. This method can best achieve the goal of reducing counterparty exposure to almost zero. The rationale behind this is that counterparty exposure can theoretically be almost completely neutralized as long as a sufficient amount of high-quality collateral, such as cash or short-term investment grade government bonds, is held against it. In the event of a counterparty default, the holder of an open derivative contract with exposure to that counterparty would be allowed to receive the collateral, thereby mitigating the risk. Option B, diversifying among counterparties, is not a viable solution in this scenario because the company already has contracts with a handful of other firms that dominate the market for the rare derivatives in question, limiting the potential for diversification. Options C and D, cross-product netting on a single counterparty basis and purchasing credit derivatives such as credit default swaps, respectively, are also incorrect. Cross-product netting would only reduce exposure to one of the counterparties, not mitigate overall exposure. Purchasing credit derivatives would replace the individual counterparty risk with counterparty risk from the institution that wrote the credit default swap, which does not achieve the goal of reducing overall counterparty exposure to almost zero. The explanation is supported by references to Jon Gregory's "The xVA Challenge: Counterparty Credit Risk, Funding, Collateral, and Capital, 3rd Edition," specifically Chapters 4 and 6, which focus on counterparty risk and collateral management, respectively. The learning objectives outlined in the file content further emphasize the importance of understanding how institutions can quantify, manage, and mitigate counterparty risk, as well as the rationale for collateral management and the terms of a collateral and features of a credit support annex (CSA) within the ISDA Master Agreement.
Author: LeetQuiz Editorial Team
Ultimate access to all questions.
In the context of a derivative trading firm that operates in a niche market by trading derivatives on rare commodities, and which holds a dominant market position alongside a few other firms with significant notional outstanding contracts, which of the following strategies would be the most effective in reducing the overall counterparty exposure to nearly zero?
A
Ensuring that sufficient collateral is posted by counterparties
B
Diversifying among counterparties
C
Cross-product netting on a single counterparty basis
D
Purchasing credit derivatives, such as credit default swaps
No comments yet.