To better understand the implications of implementing a new Value at Risk (VaR) model to replace an existing one, consider the following statement. Which one correctly encapsulates the effects observed after the replacement?

Exam-Like

Delta-normal VaR is more appropriate than historical simulation VaR for assets with non-linear payoffs.

19.0%

Changing the look-back period and weighting scheme from 3 years, equally weighted, to 4 years, exponentially weighted, will understate the risk in the portfolio.

14.3%

Overnight examination by the junior analyst increased the desk's exposure to model risk due to the potential for incorrect calibration and programming errors.

54.8%

A 99% VaR model that generates no exceedances in 6 weeks is necessarily conservative.

11.9%

Financial Risk Manager Part 2

Get started today

Comments

To better understand the implications of implementing a new Value at Risk (VaR) model to replace an existing one, consider the following statement. Which one correctly encapsulates the effects observed after the replacement?