Explanation:
B is correct. In the case of bad luck, no penalty is given, as would be the case for a bank affected by unpredictable movements in rates or markets. However, when risk models are not precise enough, a penalty is typically given since model accuracy could have easily been improved.
Ultimate access to all questions.
No comments yet.
In the context of the Basel regulatory framework, what is the most likely reason for a bank to face a penalty if it has experienced more than four instances of breaching its 1-day 99% Value at Risk (VaR) threshold over the past 250 trading days?
A
A large move in interest rates occurs in conjunction with a small move in correlations.
B
The bank's model calculates interest rate risk based on the median duration of the bonds in the portfolio.
C
A sudden market crisis in an emerging market, which leads to losses in the equity positions in that country.
D
A sudden devastating earthquake that causes major losses in the bank's key area of operation.