Financial Risk Manager Part 2

Financial Risk Manager Part 2

Get started today

Ultimate access to all questions.


  1. An investment firm has four different derivative positions with a financial institution. The market values and details of these positions are summarized in the table below:
PositionExposure (USD)
Long swaptions32 million
Long credit default swaps12 million
Long currency derivatives-16 million
Long futures contracts-8 million

Given these positions, calculate the potential loss the financial institution would face if the investment firm defaults. Evaluate the loss in two scenarios: one where netting agreements are applied between the positions, and another where no netting is considered.




Explanation:

The correct answer is B. Netting is a financial arrangement where all transactions between two parties are combined into a single net amount to be paid or received. In this scenario, the financial institution has four derivative positions with an investment company. The current market values of these positions are as follows:

  • Long swaptions: $32 million
  • Long credit default swaps: $12 million
  • Long currency derivatives: -$16 million (negative value indicates a loss or liability)
  • Long futures contracts: -$8 million (also a loss or liability)

If netting is used, the financial institution can offset the gains and losses from these positions. The net loss would be calculated by summing the positive values and subtracting the negative values:

Net loss with netting=(32+12)−(16+8)=44−24=USD 20 million\text{Net loss with netting} = (32 + 12) - (16 + 8) = 44 - 24 = \text{USD 20 million}

Without netting, the financial institution would have to recognize the full value of the long positions without offsetting the losses from the currency derivatives and futures contracts. The total loss would be:

Total loss without netting=32+12=USD 44 million\text{Total loss without netting} = 32 + 12 = \text{USD 44 million}

Thus, the use of netting reduces the loss from 44millionto44 million to 20 million, making option B the correct answer. This highlights the effectiveness of netting in reducing credit exposure and potential losses in the event of a counterparty default.