
Explanation:
The correct answer is B. Netting is a financial arrangement where all transactions between two parties are combined into a single net amount to be paid or received. In this scenario, the financial institution has four derivative positions with an investment company. The current market values of these positions are as follows:
$32 million$12 million$16 million (negative value indicates a loss or liability)$8 million (also a loss or liability)If netting is used, the financial institution can offset the gains and losses from these positions. The net loss would be calculated by summing the positive values and subtracting the negative values:
Without netting, the financial institution would have to recognize the full value of the long positions without offsetting the losses from the currency derivatives and futures contracts. The total loss would be:
Thus, the use of netting reduces the loss from $44 million to $20 million, making option B the correct answer. This highlights the effectiveness of netting in reducing credit exposure and potential losses in the event of a counterparty default.
Ultimate access to all questions.
No comments yet.
| Position | Exposure (USD) |
|---|---|
| Long swaptions | 32 million |
| Long credit default swaps | 12 million |
| Long currency derivatives | -16 million |
| Long futures contracts | -8 million |
Given these positions, calculate the potential loss the financial institution would face if the investment firm defaults. Evaluate the loss in two scenarios: one where netting agreements are applied between the positions, and another where no netting is considered.
A
Loss of USD 20 million if netting is used; loss of USD 24 million if netting is not used
B
Loss of USD 20 million if netting is used; loss of USD 44 million if netting is not used
C
Loss of USD 24 million if netting is used; loss of USD 32 million if netting is not used
D
Loss of USD 20 million if netting is used; loss of USD 24 million if netting is not used