
Ultimate access to all questions.
Your organization is planning to enhance its data governance strategy by implementing a solution that automatically tracks the movement of data across systems, visualizes data flows, and helps in understanding data origins and transformations to meet compliance and risk management objectives. Considering the need for scalability, cost-effectiveness, and integration with existing Azure services, which of the following approaches would BEST meet these requirements? (Choose two options if option E is available.)
A
Manually document data flows and transformations, which requires significant time and resources but provides full control over the documentation process.
B
Use Microsoft Purview's Data Lineage & Mapping features to automatically track the movement of data across systems and visualize data flows, leveraging Azure's integrated services for scalability and compliance.
C
Ignore data lineage and rely on individual system logs, which may not provide a comprehensive view of data movements and transformations across the organization.
D
Outsource data lineage tracking to a third-party vendor without using Microsoft Purview, potentially leading to higher costs and less integration with Azure services.
E
Combine Microsoft Purview's Data Lineage & Mapping features with manual documentation for critical systems to ensure both automated tracking and detailed manual oversight where necessary.