
Databricks Certified Data Engineer - Professional
Get started today
Ultimate access to all questions.
In the context of managing large datasets in Delta Lake on Azure Databricks, consider a scenario where a data engineer needs to archive historical data older than 3 years to comply with data retention policies while ensuring minimal impact on query performance for current data. The dataset is partitioned by year and month. Which of the following approaches BEST leverages Delta Lake's partitioning feature to achieve this goal efficiently? Choose the correct option and explain why it is the best choice.
In the context of managing large datasets in Delta Lake on Azure Databricks, consider a scenario where a data engineer needs to archive historical data older than 3 years to comply with data retention policies while ensuring minimal impact on query performance for current data. The dataset is partitioned by year and month. Which of the following approaches BEST leverages Delta Lake's partitioning feature to achieve this goal efficiently? Choose the correct option and explain why it is the best choice.
Explanation:
Option C is the best choice because it directly leverages Delta Lake's partitioning feature to efficiently isolate and manage data based on the partitioning schema (year and month). Dropping entire partitions that contain data older than 3 years is a highly efficient operation that minimizes the impact on query performance for current data and complies with data retention policies. Option A is inefficient as it involves scanning and deleting individual records, which is time-consuming and resource-intensive. Option B is incorrect because the VACUUM feature is not designed for selective data retention based on age; it removes files not referenced by the Delta table, which could include recent data if not used carefully. Option D, while feasible, is more manual and less efficient than dropping partitions, especially for large datasets.