A company operates a multi-site hybrid infrastructure with resources deployed in AWS us-east-1 and eu-west-2 Regions, as well as in on-premises data centers in the US and UK. The company uses transit gateways in both AWS Regions to connect 15 non-overlapping VPCs, with a transit gateway peering connection established between the two Regions. The on-premises data centers are interconnected via a private WAN, with dynamic IP routing using iBGP. Each data center connects to AWS through a Direct Connect connection terminated on a Direct Connect gateway, associated with a local transit gateway via a transit VIF. Traffic is routed based on the shortest geographical path, with cross-Region traffic using the private WAN to minimize AWS costs. The transit gateway associations on the Direct Connect gateway advertise only local Region VPC CIDR prefixes, while routes to the other Region are learned via BGP from the other data center in non-aggregated form. Due to recent private WAN issues disrupting cross-Region traffic, the network engineer must modify the routing setup to prevent future interruptions without altering normal traffic routing goals.

Which modifications will meet these requirements? (Choose two.)