
Explanation:
The goal is to ensure high availability across regions in a cost-effective manner. The existing setup has a single VLAN attachment in us-east1. To handle region failures, the solution must provide redundant interconnects in different regions.
Option C is correct because it combines global routing (enabling cross-region route propagation) with a new interconnect in us-west2, ensuring connectivity even if us-east1 fails. Other options either rely on redundant interconnects in the same region (which do not address region failures) or use regional routing (which limits route propagation). While adding a new interconnect in us-west2 may incur additional costs, it is necessary to meet the HA requirement for region failures in the most cost-effective way possible under the constraints.
Ultimate access to all questions.
No comments yet.
Your organization has Compute Engine instances deployed in us-east1, us-west2, and us-central1. An existing Cloud Interconnect with a single VLAN attachment and Cloud Router is configured in us-east1 on the East Coast of the United States. You need to design a highly available solution that ensures access to all VPC subnets even if a region fails, while minimizing costs. What is the most effective approach?
A
B
C
D