Explanation:
The correct approach is B. Utilizing the slots/allocated_for_project metric in a Cloud Monitoring dashboard directly provides each team with visibility into their project's slot usage, offering a straightforward method to track allocations.
totalSlotMs, which, while possible, are more complex and less direct than using the dedicated slots/allocated_for_project metric. Additionally, D aggregates data at the organization level, which doesn't serve the goal of project-specific monitoring.Ultimate access to all questions.
No comments yet.
To enable each analytics team in your organization to monitor their BigQuery slot usage within their respective projects, what is the most effective approach?
A
Develop a Cloud Monitoring dashboard utilizing the BigQuery metric query/scanned_bytes to track data scanned by queries.
B
Implement a Cloud Monitoring dashboard using the BigQuery metric slots/allocated_for_project to monitor slot allocation per project.
C
For each project, export logs, capture BigQuery job execution details, create a custom metric from totalSlotMs, and then build a Cloud Monitoring dashboard based on this metric.
D
Aggregate logs at the organization level, capture BigQuery job executions, derive a custom metric from totalSlotMs, and establish a Cloud Monitoring dashboard from this metric.