Answer-first summary for fast verification
Answer: An error budget is typically represented as a percentage nearing 100%.
The correct answer is D because an error budget approaching 100% indicates a very low SLO, implying high downtime and an unreliable application. This is contrary to the purpose of error budgets, which are meant to ensure service reliability and availability. The error budget is indeed calculated as 100% minus the SLO percentage (Option C). It's crucial for determining whether to focus on new features or on enhancing service reliability (Option A). Monitoring the rate at which the error budget is consumed is a recommended practice (Option B). For further reading, refer to: sre-error-budgets-and-maintenance-windows.
Author: LeetQuiz Editorial Team
Ultimate access to all questions.
Your team is preparing to deploy and monitor a new application in the production environment. As part of the planning phase in the staging environment, you're tasked with defining the SLIs, SLOs, and SLAs. Which statement about error budgets is NOT accurate?
A
Developers can proceed with new feature development as long as they remain within their allocated error budget.
B
An alerting mechanism should be in place to warn developers when an event is rapidly consuming a significant portion of the error budget.
C
The error budget is calculated by subtracting the defined SLO (as a percentage) from 100% for a specific SLI.
D
An error budget is typically represented as a percentage nearing 100%.
No comments yet.