Answer-first summary for fast verification
Answer: An error budget is typically represented as a percentage nearing 100%, indicating high reliability.
Option D is the correct answer because it inaccurately represents the error budget. A high error budget percentage (close to 100%) would imply a very low SLO, suggesting the application is unreliable with significant downtime. The error budget is actually 100% minus the SLO percentage, indicating the allowable amount of unreliability before corrective actions are needed. Options A, B, and C are incorrect as they accurately describe aspects of error budgets, including their calculation, the conditions under which developers can work on new features, and the importance of monitoring error budget consumption. Reference: https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/management-tools/sre-error-budgets-and-maintenance-windows
Author: LeetQuiz Editorial Team
Ultimate access to all questions.
Your team is preparing to deploy and monitor a new application in the production environment. As part of the planning, you are tasked with defining the Service Level Indicators (SLIs), Service Level Objectives (SLOs), and Service Level Agreements (SLAs) during the application's testing phase in a staging environment. Which of the following statements is NOT accurate regarding error budgets?
A
The error budget is calculated as 100% minus the defined SLO percentage for a specific SLI.
B
Developers are permitted to focus on new features as long as they remain within their allocated error budget.
C
Implementing an alerting strategy to notify developers when an unusually high percentage of the error budget is being consumed is considered a best practice.
D
An error budget is typically represented as a percentage nearing 100%, indicating high reliability.
No comments yet.