LeetQuiz Logo
Privacy Policy•contact@leetquiz.com
© 2025 LeetQuiz All rights reserved.
Google Professional Machine Learning Engineer

Google Professional Machine Learning Engineer

Get started today

Ultimate access to all questions.


In the context of preparing a large dataset for machine learning, you are tasked with reducing its dimensionality to improve model performance and reduce computational costs. The dataset contains hundreds of features, some of which are highly correlated. Given the constraints of needing to preserve as much of the original variability as possible and the requirement to facilitate easier data visualization, which of the following techniques would be the MOST appropriate to achieve these goals? Choose one correct option.

Real Exam



Explanation:

Correct Option: C. Principal Component Analysis (PCA)

Explanation:
Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is specifically designed for dimensionality reduction. It works by transforming the original variables into a new set of variables, the principal components, which are orthogonal (uncorrelated) and capture the maximum variance in the data. This makes PCA the most suitable option for the given scenario because:

  • It directly addresses the need to reduce dimensionality while preserving variability.
  • It helps in identifying patterns in data based on the correlation between features.
  • It facilitates data visualization by reducing the data to two or three principal components.

Why other options are incorrect:

  • A. Gradient Descent: While useful for optimizing model parameters, it does not inherently reduce the number of features in the dataset.
  • B. Random Forest: Although it can indicate feature importance, it does not reduce the dimensionality of the dataset in a way that preserves the original variability or facilitates visualization.
  • D. K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN): This algorithm does not reduce dimensionality; it uses all features to compute distances between data points.
Powered ByGPT-5