Explanation:
A is correct because custom roles feature a launch stage, indicated by the stage property, which helps track the role's readiness for widespread use. Setting the stage to ALPHA signifies the role is under development or testing, or includes permissions for services/features not yet public, making it unsuitable for widespread use at this stage. B is incorrect as BETA indicates limited testing or permissions for not generally available services/features, which doesn't ensure all permissions are ‘supported‘ for production. C and D are incorrect because permissions with a ‘testing’ status may not be fully supported for custom roles, risking production stability. The correct approach combines ‘supported‘ permissions with an ALPHA stage for initial testing. Learn more about custom roles and permissions support.
Ultimate access to all questions.
At a leading tech firm specializing in global CRM solutions hosted on GCP, a project requires the creation of a custom IAM role for a specific use case. The role's permissions must be production-ready, and the security team needs to monitor its status, acknowledging it's the first version with potential future updates. What is the best approach?
A
B
C
D
No comments yet.