Google Associate Cloud Engineer

Get started today

Ultimate access to all questions.

Explanation:

The correct choice is Cloud Storage because it is specifically designed for hosting static websites efficiently and cost-effectively. It allows you to serve content directly from a bucket, ensuring high availability and fast delivery through Google's global edge caches. Unlike other options, Cloud Storage does not require managing servers or containers, making it ideal for static content with a limited budget.

Compute Engine and Kubernetes Engine involve managing virtual machines or containers, which are more complex and costly for static content.
App Engine, while capable of hosting websites, is more suited for dynamic applications and may incur higher costs for static sites.

For more details, refer to the Google Cloud Storage documentation on hosting static websites.

Explanation:

Compute Engine and Kubernetes Engine involve managing virtual machines or containers, which are more complex and costly for static content.
App Engine, while capable of hosting websites, is more suited for dynamic applications and may incur higher costs for static sites.

For more details, refer to the Google Cloud Storage documentation on hosting static websites.

Comments (0)

No comments yet.

Your team is evaluating Google Cloud services to host a static website consisting of a dozen HTML pages, some JavaScript, and CSS files. The website must remain highly available for its few weeks of operation, and the budget is tight. Which Google Cloud service is the most cost-effective and suitable for this scenario?

Real Exam

Last updated: January 15, 2026 at 14:03

Compute Engine

15.9%

App Engine

19.5%

Cloud Storage

50.0%

Kubernetes Engine

14.6%