Explanation:
Explanation:
Option A is correct because the added material is plagiarized from Macharia's previous work for another client, violating Standard I(C) Misrepresentation, which prohibits plagiarism and misrepresentation in professional activities. Removing the material and reporting the issue aligns with Standard I(A) Knowledge of the Law, ensuring ethical behavior and protecting client interests under Standard III(A) Loyalty, Prudence, and Care.
Option B is incorrect because delaying action would allow unethical behavior to persist, violating Standard I(A) and failing to protect client interests under Standard III(A).
Option C is incorrect because minor changes would not resolve the plagiarism issue, and using another client's proprietary process misrepresents MKI's capabilities, violating Standard I(C).
Ultimate access to all questions.
Ann Macharia, CFA, is an independent consultant reviewing a proposal for MK Investment (MKI). She notices that MKI's CIO has added material identical to her previous work for another client, describing their proprietary investment process. According to the CFA Institute Standards of Professional Conduct, Macharia is most likely required to:
A
Remove the copied material and report her concerns to MKI to avoid plagiarism and misrepresentation.
B
Delay addressing the issue until after the proposal is submitted to comply with her consulting contract.
C
Verify if MKI's investment process aligns with the added material and make minor adjustments to avoid plagiarism.
No comments yet.