Answer-first summary for fast verification
Answer: No, as Berkstein relied on her senior colleagues' due diligence, and Brooks' inclusion in the report does not violate the Standard.
According to **Standard V(A) - Diligence and Reasonable Basis**, a member or candidate may rely on others within their firm to validate secondary or third-party research, provided there is no reason to question its validity or the processes used. Berkstein's reliance on her senior colleagues' due diligence is acceptable under this Standard, as there is no indication she had reason to doubt it. Similarly, Brooks did not violate the Standard by leaving his name on the group report, as the report represents the consensus of the group, not necessarily his personal views. If the member or candidate is confident in the process and the report's independence and objectivity, they need not dissociate from it, even if it contradicts their opinion.
Author: LeetQuiz Editorial Team
Ultimate access to all questions.
No comments yet.
Emma Berkstein, CFA, utilizes third-party data for a company report without personally verifying its validity, relying instead on senior colleagues for due diligence. Jimmy Brooks, CFA, collaborates on an industry report with a positive outlook, despite disagreeing with the conclusion but retaining his name on the report. Has the Standard regarding diligence and reasonable basis most likely been violated?
A
No, as Berkstein relied on her senior colleagues' due diligence, and Brooks' inclusion in the report does not violate the Standard.
B
Yes, due to Brooks' actions.
C
Yes, due to Berkstein's actions.