
Explanation:
1. Serverless SQL Pool vs Dedicated SQL Pool Architecture
2. Data Flow Disconnect
3. Transformation Timing Issue
4. Better Alternative Approaches
The proposed solution creates an external table with an additional DateTime column, but this external table is separate from Table1 in the dedicated SQL pool and doesn't automatically populate Table1 with the transformed data. The solution fails to establish the necessary data pipeline between the external table and the target Table1, and doesn't address the actual data loading and transformation requirements.
Ultimate access to all questions.
You have an Azure Synapse Analytics dedicated SQL pool with a table named Table1. Data files are ingested into an Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2 container named container1. You plan to insert and transform data from these files into Table1, with each file row producing one row in the table. You need to ensure that when the source data files are loaded into container1, the current DateTime is stored as an additional column in Table1.
Proposed Solution: Use an Azure Synapse Analytics serverless SQL pool to create an external table that includes an additional DateTime column.
Does this solution meet the goal?
A
Yes
B
No
No comments yet.