Answer: No

## Analysis of the Proposed Solution The goal requires storing the **DateTime** as an **additional column** in Table1 when source data files are loaded into container1. The proposed solution uses a **Get Metadata activity** to retrieve the DateTime of the files. ### Why the Solution Does NOT Meet the Goal 1. **Get Metadata Activity Functionality**: - The Get Metadata activity retrieves metadata about files (e.g., file name, size, last modified date) but **does not modify or enrich the data content**. - It can extract the DateTime (e.g., last modified timestamp) of files in container1, but this metadata remains separate from the actual data rows being processed. 2. **Missing Data Transformation**: - To add an additional column to Table1, the DateTime value must be **incorporated into each row** during data ingestion/transformation. - The Get Metadata activity alone cannot map the retrieved DateTime to individual rows in the data flow. It lacks the capability to **append this value as a column** to the dataset. 3. **Required Approach**: - A proper solution would involve: - Using a **data flow** with a **derived column transformation** to create the new DateTime column. - Alternatively, using the Get Metadata activity **in conjunction with** a ForEach loop and data flow to process each file and dynamically add the DateTime. - The proposed solution stops at metadata retrieval without the necessary steps to persist the DateTime in Table1. ### Conclusion While the Get Metadata activity can retrieve file DateTime, it does not fulfill the requirement of storing this DateTime as an additional column in the table. The solution is **insufficient** without downstream transformations to embed the metadata into the data rows.

Author: LeetQuiz Editorial Team