
Explanation:
To ensure the Azure Data Lake Gen2 storage account remains available if a data center fails in the primary Azure region while minimizing costs, Zone-Redundant Storage (ZRS) is the optimal choice.
A: Geo-Redundant Storage (GRS) - While GRS provides cross-region replication and would maintain availability during a data center failure, it is more expensive than ZRS due to the additional replication to a secondary region. This violates the cost minimization requirement.
B: Geo-Zone-Redundant Storage (GZRS) - GZRS combines ZRS in the primary region with geo-replication to a secondary region. This provides the highest level of durability but is the most expensive option, making it unsuitable for cost minimization.
C: Locally-Redundant Storage (LRS) - LRS replicates data three times within a single data center. If that entire data center fails, all data replicas become unavailable, violating the availability requirement. While LRS is the cheapest option, it doesn't meet the business continuity needs specified in the scenario.
ZRS provides the right balance of availability protection against data center failures while maintaining cost efficiency within the primary region.
Ultimate access to all questions.
You are implementing an Azure Data Lake Gen2 storage account. You need to ensure the data lake remains available if a datacenter fails in the primary Azure region, while minimizing costs. Which type of replication should you use for the storage account?
A
geo-redundant storage (GRS)
B
geo-zone-redundant storage (GZRS)
C
locally-redundant storage (LRS)
D
zone-redundant storage (ZRS)
No comments yet.