
Explanation:
This question involves identifying tables with a high percentage of deleted rows in an Azure Synapse Analytics dedicated SQL pool. The key distinction here is that we're working with Azure Synapse Analytics (formerly SQL Data Warehouse), which uses a massively parallel processing (MPP) architecture with distributed data across multiple compute nodes.
Option C: sys.pdw_nodes_column_store_row_groups ✅ CORRECT
total_rows: Total number of rows in the row groupdeleted_rows: Number of rows marked as deletedstate_description: Current state of the row group(deleted_rows * 100.0 / total_rows)Option D: sys.dm_db_column_store_row_group_physical_stats ❌ INCORRECT
Option A: sys.pdw_nodes_column_store_segments ❌ INCORRECT
Option B: sys.dm_db_column_store_row_group_operational_stats ❌ INCORRECT
Azure Synapse Analytics dedicated SQL pools use a distributed architecture where data is partitioned across multiple compute nodes. The sys.pdw_nodes_* system views are specifically designed to provide visibility into this distributed environment. The sys.pdw_nodes_column_store_row_groups view gives you the necessary information across all distributions to accurately calculate deletion percentages and identify tables that would benefit from index maintenance operations like ALTER INDEX REORGANIZE or ALTER INDEX REBUILD.
When working with columnstore indexes in Azure Synapse Analytics, regularly monitoring row group health using sys.pdw_nodes_column_store_row_groups is a recommended practice. High deletion percentages (typically > 20%) indicate that row groups should be rebuilt to maintain optimal query performance and storage efficiency.
Ultimate access to all questions.
You have an Azure Synapse Analytics dedicated SQL pool named SA1 containing a table named Table1. You need to identify which tables have a high percentage of deleted rows. What should you execute?
A
sys.pdw_nodes_column_store_segments
B
sys.dm_db_column_store_row_group_operational_stats
C
sys.pdw_nodes_column_store_row_groups
D
sys.dm_db_column_store_row_group_physical_stats
No comments yet.