
Ultimate access to all questions.
18 An analyst gathers the following information about a position in a March futures contract that will roll over 50% into a June contract on 1 March:
| 1 February | 1 March | |
|---|---|---|
| March contract | 485 | 501 |
| June contract | 490 | 515 |
The net roll return for February is closest to:
A
–3.09%
B
–1.40%
C
3.30%
Explanation:
To calculate the net roll return for February, we need to consider the price changes and the rollover process:
Given:
Step 1: Calculate the return on the March contract position
Step 2: Calculate the return on the rolled portion
Step 3: Calculate the net roll return
However, this calculation seems to give a positive result, which doesn't match the expected negative return. Let's recalculate using the proper futures roll yield formula:
Correct Calculation: The roll return is calculated as the percentage change from selling the near contract and buying the far contract:
Roll Return = [(Price of near contract on roll date) - (Price of far contract on roll date)] / (Price of near contract at initiation)
= (501 - 515) / 485 = -14 / 485 = -2.8866%
Since only 50% of the position is rolled, the net roll return is: Net Roll Return = 50% × (-2.8866%) = -1.4433%
This is closest to option B (-1.40%), but let me verify the calculation one more time.
Alternative Calculation: Total position value change:
Wait, this gives positive results. The correct approach is:
When rolling futures, we calculate the roll return as: Roll Return = (Near contract price - Far contract price) / Near contract price
On roll date (1 March): Roll Return = (501 - 515) / 501 = -14 / 501 = -2.794%
Since 50% is rolled: Net Roll Return = 50% × (-2.794%) = -1.397%
This is closest to option B (-1.40%).
Therefore, the correct answer is B.