
Answer-first summary for fast verification
Answer: The variability explained by the model is 2.925
## Explanation In ordinary least squares (OLS) regression analysis: - **Total Sum of Squares (SST)** = 3.125 represents the total variability in the dependent variable (foetal weight) - **Regression Sum of Squares (SSREG)** = 2.925 represents the variability explained by the model - **Residual Sum of Squares (SSRES)** = 0.2 represents the variability unexplained by the model The relationship between these components is: **SST = SSREG + SSRES** **Why C is correct:** - SSREG (2.925) measures how much of the total variability in foetal weight is explained by the number of weeks of gestation - This represents the portion of variation that can be attributed to the relationship between the variables **Why other options are incorrect:** - **A**: 0.2 is SSRES, which is the *unexplained* variability, not the explained variability - **B**: 3.125 is SST, which is the *total* variability, not the unexplained variability - **D**: 3.125 is SST, which includes both explained and unexplained variability, not just the explained portion The high SSREG value (2.925 out of 3.125 total) indicates that the model explains most of the variability in foetal weight, suggesting a strong relationship with weeks of gestation.
Author: Tanishq Prabhu
Ultimate access to all questions.
No comments yet.
Ordinary least squares is used to estimate the relationship between foetal weight and the number of weeks of gestation in a group of women. The exercise gives the following results:
This implies that:
A
The variability explained by the model is 0.2
B
The variability unexplained by the model is 3.125
C
The variability explained by the model is 2.925
D
The variability explained by the model is 3.125