
Explanation:
In statistical hypothesis testing:
Since 1.4% > 1%, the candidate would fail to reject the null hypothesis.
A. Reject the null hypothesis - Incorrect because p-value (1.4%) > significance level (1%)
C. Conclude that the mean return is different from zero - Incorrect because failing to reject the null hypothesis means we don't have sufficient evidence to conclude the mean is different from zero
D. Conclude that the mean return is negative - Incorrect because the test only determines if the mean is different from zero, not the direction of the difference
A p-value greater than the significance level indicates insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis, meaning we cannot conclude the mean return is statistically different from zero.
Ultimate access to all questions.
No comments yet.
During a statistical test to determine if the mean return on an asset is different from zero, an FRM Part 1 candidate obtains a p-value of 1.4%. With a significance level of 1%, she would:
A
Reject the null hypothesis.
B
Fail to reject the null hypothesis.
C
Conclude that the mean return is different from zero.
D
Conclude that the mean return is negative (loss).