Financial Risk Manager Part 1

Financial Risk Manager Part 1

Get started today

Ultimate access to all questions.


Consider the following 2 regression models:

Model 1: yt=Ξ²1+Ξ²2x2t+uty_t = \beta_1 + \beta_2 x_{2t} + u_t

Model 2: yt=Ξ²1+Ξ²2x2t+Ξ²3x3t+uty_t = \beta_1 + \beta_2 x_{2t} + \beta_3 x_{3t} + u_t

A researcher determines that the two models have identical R-squared values. This most likely implies that:

TTanishq



Explanation:

Explanation

When two regression models have identical R-squared values, it indicates that the additional variable in the second model (x3x_3) does not contribute to the explanatory power of the model for the dependent variable yy.

Key Points:

  • R-squared represents the proportion of variance in the dependent variable explained by the independent variables
  • Identical R-squared values mean x3x_3 provides no additional explanatory power
  • Adjusted R-squared penalizes models for including unnecessary predictors
  • Since x3x_3 doesn't improve model fit, the adjusted R-squared for Model 2 will be lower than Model 1

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

  • B: Adjusted R-squared only increases if new predictors improve model fit more than expected by chance
  • C: Adjusted R-squared accounts for number of predictors, so identical R-squared doesn't imply identical adjusted R-squared
  • D: If x3x_3 were statistically significant, it would improve R-squared, which contradicts the given condition

Mathematical Insight:

The adjusted R-squared formula: Radj2=1βˆ’(1βˆ’R2)(nβˆ’1)nβˆ’kβˆ’1R^2_{adj} = 1 - \frac{(1-R^2)(n-1)}{n-k-1} where nn is sample size and kk is number of predictors. Since Model 2 has more predictors (k=2k=2) than Model 1 (k=1k=1) with the same R2R^2, the denominator increases, making Radj2R^2_{adj} smaller for Model 2.

Comments

Loading comments...