
Ultimate access to all questions.
Unlike structural models, pure time series models do not incorporate any explanatory variable. Which of the following is a disadvantage of pure time series models when compared to the structural models?
A
They are not theoretically motivated.
B
They cannot produce forecasts easily.
C
They cannot be used when the data has a very high frequency.
D
It's difficult to select the most appropriate explanatory variables to include in a pure time-series model.
Explanation:
Pure time series models are not theoretically motivated. This means that they lack a solid theoretical foundation that explains why the current value of a variable should be related to its past values and to the values of a random error process. For instance, in the context of stock returns, it might be difficult to understand why the current value of a stock return should be related to its past values and to the values of a random error process without any theoretical backing. It would be more theoretically sound to explain return fluctuations using some macroeconomic variables that influence profitability, such as the state of the economy as a whole. This lack of theoretical motivation is a significant disadvantage of pure time series models when compared to structural models, which incorporate explanatory variables and are therefore more theoretically grounded.
Why other options are incorrect: