
Financial Risk Manager Part 1
Get started today
Ultimate access to all questions.
In machine learning, a model's complexity is often determined by the number of features it incorporates. Which of the following statements correctly describes the bias-variance trade-off for large models with many features versus smaller models with fewer features?
Exam-Like
Community
TTanishq
Explanation:
Explanation
In machine learning, the bias-variance trade-off is a fundamental concept that describes the relationship between model complexity and performance:
Large Models with Many Features (Complex Models):
- Low Bias: These models are flexible and can capture complex patterns in the training data, making fewer assumptions about the underlying truth
- High Variance: Due to their complexity, they are sensitive to fluctuations in the training data and may overfit, performing poorly on new, unseen data
Smaller Models with Fewer Features (Simple Models):
- High Bias: These models make more assumptions about the underlying truth and may oversimplify the problem, potentially missing important patterns
- Low Variance: They are less sensitive to training data fluctuations and may generalize better to new data, though they might underfit
Why Other Options Are Incorrect:
- Option A: Incorrect because large models don't have low variance - they typically have high variance due to overfitting
- Option B: Incorrect because large models don't have high bias - they have low bias due to their ability to fit complex patterns
- Option D: Incorrect because large models don't have high bias and low variance - this describes the opposite relationship
This bias-variance trade-off is crucial in machine learning model design, where practitioners must balance model complexity to achieve optimal performance on both training and test data.
Comments
Loading comments...