Financial Risk Manager Part 1

Financial Risk Manager Part 1

Get started today

Ultimate access to all questions.


In machine learning, a model's complexity is often determined by the number of features it incorporates. Which of the following statements correctly describes the bias-variance trade-off for large models with many features versus smaller models with fewer features?

TTanishq



Explanation:

Explanation

In machine learning, the bias-variance trade-off is a fundamental concept that describes the relationship between model complexity and performance:

Large Models with Many Features (Complex Models):

  • Low Bias: These models are flexible and can capture complex patterns in the training data, making fewer assumptions about the underlying truth
  • High Variance: Due to their complexity, they are sensitive to fluctuations in the training data and may overfit, performing poorly on new, unseen data

Smaller Models with Fewer Features (Simple Models):

  • High Bias: These models make more assumptions about the underlying truth and may oversimplify the problem, potentially missing important patterns
  • Low Variance: They are less sensitive to training data fluctuations and may generalize better to new data, though they might underfit

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

  • Option A: Incorrect because large models don't have low variance - they typically have high variance due to overfitting
  • Option B: Incorrect because large models don't have high bias - they have low bias due to their ability to fit complex patterns
  • Option D: Incorrect because large models don't have high bias and low variance - this describes the opposite relationship

This bias-variance trade-off is crucial in machine learning model design, where practitioners must balance model complexity to achieve optimal performance on both training and test data.

Comments

Loading comments...