
Answer-first summary for fast verification
Answer: Sharpe ratio
### Answer **C — Sharpe ratio** ### What Sharpe measures (and formula) Sharpe = (Rp − Rf) / σp - Rp = portfolio return, Rf = risk‑free rate, σp = standard deviation of portfolio returns. - It measures excess return per unit of *total risk* (standard deviation), so it includes both systematic and idiosyncratic volatility. ### Quick numeric example If Rp = 12%, Rf = 2%, and σp = 10%: Sharpe = (0.12 − 0.02) / 0.10 = 1.0 → one unit of excess return per unit of total volatility (a good result). ### Why the other choices are wrong - Jensen’s alpha: alpha = Rp − [Rf + βp (Rm − Rf)]. This gives an absolute abnormal return relative to CAPM, not a “per unit of total risk” ratio. - Treynor ratio: Treynor = (Rp − Rf) / βp. Denominator is beta (systematic risk) only, so it measures reward per unit of market risk — appropriate when portfolios are well diversified and idiosyncratic risk is negligible. - Sortino ratio: Sortino = (Rp − Rf) / downside deviation. It focuses only on harmful (downside) volatility, not total volatility. ### When to use each - Use Sharpe when you care about all volatility (undiversified portfolios, absolute comparisons). - Use Treynor for well‑diversified portfolios where only market risk matters. - Use Sortino when downside risk matters more than upside variability. - Use Jensen’s alpha to test manager skill vs CAPM expectations. Think critically: choose the metric that matches your risk definition—total, downside, or just systematic—because each answers a different practical question.
Author: Tanishq Prabhu
Ultimate access to all questions.
No comments yet.
Q.3488 Measuring excess return per unit of risk is essential for evaluating the performance of an investment relative to its risk level. Which of the following measures excess return per unit of total risk?
A
Jensen's alpha
B
Treynor ratio
C
Sharpe ratio
D
Sortino ratio