
Ultimate access to all questions.
In the lead-up to the 2007/2009 financial crisis, Lehman Brothers had positioned itself as the leading institution in the mortgage-backed securities market. Which of the following best explains why the firm failed so spectacularly despite boasting huge amounts of capital?
Explanation:
Lehman Brothers' failure was primarily due to its high leverage, which significantly reduced its ability to absorb losses.
Choice B: While Lehman had significant exposure to sub-prime mortgage assets, this was not the primary reason. Many institutions had similar exposure but didn't fail - the key difference was Lehman's leverage level.
Choice C: The "too big to fail" concept didn't apply here - Lehman was allowed to fail without government intervention or bailout.
Choice D: Lack of investor confidence was an outcome, not the primary cause. It was triggered by the high leverage and subprime exposure.
High leverage amplifies losses and reduces a firm's ability to withstand market downturns, making it a critical risk factor that must be carefully managed.