Explanation
The Metallgesellschaft case is a classic example of a hedging strategy failure due to cash flow timing mismatches.
Key Points:
- Metallgesellschaft sold long-term fixed-price oil contracts to customers
- To hedge these positions, they used short-term futures contracts
- This created a mismatch between:
- Long-term receivables (fixed price oil deliveries over time)
- Short-term payables (frequent margin calls on futures positions)
Why Option D is Correct:
- When oil prices fell, Metallgesellschaft faced massive margin calls on their short futures positions
- However, they couldn't collect the corresponding gains from their long-term contracts immediately
- This cash flow timing difference created a liquidity crisis that forced them to unwind positions at a loss
Why Other Options are Incorrect:
- A: While German accounting rules may have influenced reporting, they weren't the primary cause
- B: There was no evidence of outright fraud in the case
- C: Computer systems weren't identified as a major contributing factor
The case demonstrates the critical importance of considering cash flow timing and liquidity risk in hedging strategies, especially when using short-term instruments to hedge long-term exposures.