
Ultimate access to all questions.
In the 2008 financial crisis, agency costs were a significant factor that contributed to the unfolding of events. Which of the following scenarios best represents an instance of agency cost during the 2008 financial crisis?
A
Prospective homeowners lying about their income and mortgage security.
B
A lack of government regulation of the property market in the period leading to the crisis.
C
Rating agencies were paid for their ratings and would overlook potential financial pitfalls so as to impress their clients.
D
Failure by Congress and the Senate to crack down on relaxed lending even after a few leaders brought the matter to the floors of the two houses.
Explanation:
Agency costs are incurred when there is a conflict of interest between two parties, often due to misaligned incentives. In the context of the 2008 financial crisis, rating agencies were paid by their clients to rate financial instruments. These agencies had a vested interest in providing favorable ratings to keep their clients happy and secure future business. This led to a situation where they overlooked potential financial risks, thereby underestimating the inherent risks in Asset-Backed Securities (ABSs) and Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs). By maximizing the number of AAA-rated tranches, the agencies misled investors into purchasing overvalued and overrated instruments. This is a clear example of agency cost, where the rating agencies pursued their selfish interests at the expense of the investors.
Why other options are incorrect: