
Answer-first summary for fast verification
Answer: controlling shareholders
## Explanation The principal-agent conflict arises when managers (agents) may not act in the best interests of shareholders (principals). This conflict is most severe when: - **Dispersed ownership**: Many small shareholders who individually lack incentive/monitoring power - **Dispersed voting power**: No single shareholder has significant voting control **Mitigation mechanisms**: - **Voting caps (A)**: Limit voting power regardless of share ownership - actually exacerbates the problem by further dispersing control - **Controlling shareholders (B)**: Large shareholders with significant voting power have strong incentives to monitor management and ensure alignment with shareholder interests - **Insiders with large ownership (C)**: While helpful, insiders may still prioritize personal interests over general shareholder interests **Correct answer is B** because controlling shareholders provide the most effective monitoring mechanism for the specific scenario of dispersed ownership and dispersed voting power.
Author: LeetQuiz Editorial Team
Ultimate access to all questions.
No comments yet.
With respect to corporate ownership structures, the principal–agent conflict caused by the combination of dispersed ownership and dispersed voting power is best mitigated through:
A
voting caps
B
controlling shareholders
C
insiders with large ownership positions