
Explanation:
Explanation:
Option A is incorrect: Monte Carlo simulation is actually very appropriate for securities with path-dependent cash flows, such as mortgage-backed securities or callable bonds, where future cash flows depend on the path of interest rates.
Option B is incorrect: While increasing the number of paths generally improves accuracy, there's a point of diminishing returns, and the model may not necessarily converge to the "fundamental value" due to model limitations and assumptions.
Option C is correct: Monte Carlo simulation for bond valuation requires:
Ultimate access to all questions.
Which of the following statements regarding the Monte Carlo method to value bonds is most accurate?
A
It is not appropriate for securities whose cash flows are path dependent
B
The greater the number of paths, the closer the model is to the security's fundamental value
C
A probability distribution and a volatility assumption are needed to generate interest rate paths
No comments yet.