
Explanation:
In structural models of credit risk (like the Merton model), the relationship between debt and equity can be interpreted using option pricing theory:
Equity is a purchased call option on the assets: This is the correct interpretation. Shareholders have a call option on the firm's assets with a strike price equal to the face value of debt. If the asset value exceeds the debt value at maturity, shareholders exercise their option and keep the residual value.
Debt is equivalent to a risk-free bond minus a put option: The correct interpretation is that debt holders are long a risk-free bond and short a put option on the assets. This means they receive the risk-free payment but have sold downside protection to shareholders.
Option B is incorrect because it reverses the positions - debt is actually short a put option, not long one.
Option C is incorrect because it doesn't accurately represent the option relationships in structural models.
The key insight is that shareholders have limited liability - they can't lose more than their investment, which gives them option-like characteristics.
Ultimate access to all questions.
No comments yet.
Which of the following is the most appropriate interpretation of debt and equity in terms of options in a structural model of credit risk?
A
Equity is a purchased call option on the assets
B
Debt is short a risk-free bond and long a put option on the assets
C
Debt is short the assets and long a call option sold by the shareholders