
Answer-first summary for fast verification
Answer: Spearman correlation
## Explanation **Spearman correlation** is the best choice here because: - Credit ratings are **ordinal data** (categories with a natural order but not necessarily equal intervals) - The relationship between rating categories from different agencies is likely **nonlinear** but **monotonic** - Spearman correlation measures the **monotonic relationship** between two variables, regardless of whether the relationship is linear **Why other options are less appropriate:** - **Pearson correlation (B)**: Assumes linear relationship and interval data, which doesn't fit ordinal rating categories - **Structured correlation matrix (C)**: Typically used for modeling dependencies between multiple variables in structured finance, not for measuring association between two ordinal variables - **Covariance (D)**: Measures linear relationship and is sensitive to the scale of measurement, making it unsuitable for ordinal data **Key Concept**: Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (ρ) works by ranking the data and then applying Pearson correlation to the ranks, making it ideal for ordinal data where we care about the order but not necessarily the exact numerical differences between categories.
Author: LeetQuiz Editorial Team
Ultimate access to all questions.
| Rating categories | Description |
|---|---|
| 1 | High investment grade |
| 2 | Mid investment grade |
| 3 | Low investment grade |
| 4 | Non-investment grade |
The manager plots the rating categories from the two agencies as shown below:
[Image blocked: Corporate Ratings: Agency X vs. Agency Y]
Which of the following statistical measures could best help the manager approximate the link between rating categories from the two agencies?
A
Spearman correlation
B
Pearson correlation
C
Structured correlation matrix
D
Covariance
No comments yet.