Explanation:
B is correct. In the case of bad luck, no penalty is given, as would be the case for a bank affected by unpredictable movements in rates or markets. However, when risk models are not precise enough, a penalty is typically given since model accuracy could have easily been improved.
Explanation:
The Basel framework distinguishes between exceptions due to bad luck (market movements) and exceptions due to model inadequacy. When models can be easily improved but aren't, penalties are applied.
Ultimate access to all questions.
A regulatory analyst at an investment bank is reviewing the Basel Committee rules for backtesting VaR models. The analyst notes that under the Basel framework, a penalty can be given to banks that have more than four exceptions to their 1-day 99% VaR over the last 250 trading days. Which of the following scenarios is most likely to result in a penalty?
A
A large move in interest rates occurs in conjunction with a small move in correlations.
B
The bank's model calculates interest rate risk based on the median duration of the bonds in the portfolio.
C
A sudden market crisis in an emerging market, which leads to losses in the equity positions in that country.
D
A sudden devastating earthquake that causes major losses in the bank's key area of operation.
No comments yet.