
Explanation:
Let's analyze the Ito's Lemma decomposition for the bond price:
This can be rewritten in terms of bond return:
For a zero-coupon bond:
Now let's evaluate each option:
A. Incorrect - The decomposition doesn't mention "spread" changes. It decomposes return into time passage, rate changes, and volatility effects.
B. Incorrect - Decreases in rates actually increase bond returns (bond prices rise when rates fall), and the effect is proportional to duration.
C. Correct - The term represents the return due to the passage of time. For a zero-coupon bond, this equals the instantaneous spot rate (this is the drift term in the bond pricing equation).
D. Incorrect - Lowering rate volatility increases bond return in proportion to convexity, not reduces it. The convexity term is positive for bonds, so lower volatility reduces this positive component.
Therefore, option C is the correct statement about the bond return decomposition.
Ultimate access to all questions.
No comments yet.
Denote the time-t price of a T-year zero bond by , where is the instantaneous spot rate. By Ito's Lemma,
We can obtain a simple decomposition of the bond's return. Which of the following statements is correct regarding the decomposition?
A
The decomposition result states that the return is due to the passage of time, the changes in the rate, and the changes in the spread.
B
The decomposition result states that the decreases in rate reduce bond return in proportion to duration.
C
The decomposition result states that the return due to the passage of time is the instantaneous spot rate.
D
The decomposition result states that lowering rate volatility reduces bond return in proportion to convexity.