
Answer-first summary for fast verification
Answer: heteroscedasticity in the underlying
## Explanation The volatility smirk pattern in equity options, where low strike price options have higher implied volatility than high strike price options, can be explained by several factors: **Valid explanations for the volatility smirk:** - **Option B**: As equity prices fall, the proportion of debt in the capital structure increases, making the firm more leveraged and increasing volatility - **Option C**: As equity prices rise, firm leverage decreases, reducing volatility - **Option D**: The threat of another market crash creates demand for downside protection, increasing implied volatility for low strike options **Why Option A is NOT used as an explanation:** Heteroscedasticity refers to non-constant variance in the underlying asset's returns over time. While heteroscedasticity exists in financial markets (as captured by GARCH models), it is not specifically cited as an explanation for the volatility smirk pattern. The smirk is more directly explained by leverage effects, crash fears, and demand for downside protection rather than general time-varying volatility patterns. The leverage explanation (B and C) is particularly important because as a company's stock price falls, its debt-to-equity ratio increases, making the equity more volatile and option-like in nature.
Author: LeetQuiz .
Ultimate access to all questions.
Equity options tend to exhibit a volatility "smirk" where low strike price options have a higher implied volatility than high strike price options. An explanation that has not been used for the smirk pattern is:
A
heteroscedasticity in the underlying
B
a higher proportion of debt in the capital structure as equity prices fall
C
less firm leverage as equity prices rise
D
the threat of another market crash
No comments yet.