Ultimate access to all questions.
Answer-first summary for fast verification
Answer: The repercussion for violating the solvency capital requirement is likely liquidation and the transfer of company insurance policies to another firm.
**Correct Answer: C** **Explanation:** - **Option A is incorrect**: Basel II specifically applies to banks, not insurance companies. Insurance companies are regulated under different frameworks such as Solvency II in Europe. - **Option B is incorrect**: The minimum capital requirement (MCR) is typically lower than the solvency capital requirement (SCR). The SCR represents the capital needed to absorb significant unforeseen losses, while the MCR is the absolute minimum level below which regulatory intervention occurs. - **Option C is correct**: Violating the solvency capital requirement can indeed lead to severe consequences including liquidation and transfer of insurance policies to another firm, as regulators aim to protect policyholders. - **Option D is incorrect**: While both approaches involve internal modeling, the time horizons differ. Solvency II typically uses a one-year VaR at 99.5% confidence level, whereas Basel II's internal ratings-based approach for credit risk uses different time horizons and confidence levels depending on the risk type.
Author: LeetQuiz .
No comments yet.
Which of the following statements is correct regarding capital requirements for insurance companies?
A
Basel II includes the regulation of banks and insurance companies in the three pillars.
B
The minimum capital requirement is likely to be higher than the solvency capital requirement for insurance companies.
C
The repercussion for violating the solvency capital requirement is likely liquidation and the transfer of company insurance policies to another firm.
D
The internal models approach to calculating the solvency capital requirement is similar to internal ratings based approach under Basel II in that the firm must calculate a VaR with a one-year time horizon.