
Answer-first summary for fast verification
Answer: The higher the expected payoff of an asset in bad times, the lower the asset's expected return
## Explanation The correct relationship is: **The higher the expected payoff of an asset in bad times, the lower the asset's expected return**. This is based on **consumption-based asset pricing theory**: - **Bad times** refer to periods when consumption is low and marginal utility is high - Assets that pay off well during bad times provide valuable **consumption insurance** - Investors are willing to **pay more** (accept lower returns) for assets that protect them during economic downturns - This creates an **inverse relationship** between expected returns and payoffs during bad times **Key concepts:** - Assets with high payoffs during bad times are like insurance policies - They command higher prices, leading to lower expected returns - This explains why defensive stocks (utilities, consumer staples) typically have lower expected returns than cyclical stocks - The relationship is driven by investor risk aversion and the desire for consumption smoothing
Author: LeetQuiz .
Ultimate access to all questions.
Q-6. Which behavior does asset payoffs and "bad times" events would most likely perform?
A
The expected payoff of an asset in bad times is unrelated to the asset's expected return, because arbitrageurs eliminate any expected return potential.
B
The expected payoff of an asset in bad times is unrelated to the asset's expected return, because it depends on investor preferences.
C
The higher the expected payoff of an asset in bad times, the higher the asset's expected return.
D
The higher the expected payoff of an asset in bad times, the lower the asset's expected return
No comments yet.