Answer-first summary for fast verification
Answer: ABC's operational risk.
## Explanation A central clearinghouse would primarily reduce **ABC's operational risk** for several key reasons: ### What Happened in the Scenario: - ABC was defrauded by Repo Co. through false documentation of non-existent collateral - This represents an **operational risk** event - specifically fraud risk - The fraud led to ABC freezing XYZ's credit line, creating liquidity issues ### How a Central Clearinghouse Helps: 1. **Collateral Verification**: Central clearinghouses rigorously verify and validate all collateral, preventing fraudulent documentation 2. **Standardized Processes**: They establish standardized procedures for collateral management and documentation 3. **Risk Management**: Central counterparties have sophisticated risk management systems to detect and prevent fraud 4. **Netting and Settlement**: They provide centralized netting and settlement, reducing counterparty risk ### Why Other Options Are Incorrect: - **A. ABC's funding liquidity risk**: While the fraud indirectly affected ABC's liquidity, the clearinghouse primarily addresses operational risk, not funding liquidity risk directly - **B. Repo Co.'s default risk**: The clearinghouse doesn't reduce Repo Co.'s default risk; it manages the consequences of default - **C. XYZ's lending risk**: XYZ's lending risk relates to their business loans, not the repo transactions with ABC ### Key Insight: The core problem was **operational** - fraudulent documentation that a central clearinghouse would have detected and prevented through its verification processes and risk management controls.
Author: LeetQuiz .
Ultimate access to all questions.
XYZ, a small investment management firm, specializes in structuring small business loans and selling the government guaranteed portion to other institutional investors while retaining the riskier portions for high net worth investors. XYZ funds its operations by engaging in overnight repurchase agreements (repos) with three firms, but primarily with ABC, a firm that specializes in pooling funds from community banks and local government agencies and investing them in short-term, high-quality, government-secured investments.
Last week, XYZ was informed by ABC that its line had been frozen. XYZ learned that ABC had been defrauded by Repo Co., another repo borrower, who had provided false documentation of non-existent collateral of government-guaranteed loans. ABC feared a run by its investors as news of the fraud spread.
The diagram below illustrates the parties involved:
ABC Co.
/ \
XYZ Co. Repo Co.
ABC Co.
/ \
XYZ Co. Repo Co.
The use of a central clearinghouse to handle the transactions executed between XYZ's main funding source, ABC and ABC's client, Repo Co., would likely have resulted in a reduction in:
A
ABC's funding liquidity risk.
B
Repo Co.'s default risk.
C
XYZ's lending risk.
D
ABC's operational risk.
No comments yet.