
Explanation:
To understand why GARCH (1,1) will forecast a lower volatility than EWMA under these conditions, let's examine the model equations:
EWMA Model:
GARCH (1,1) Model:
Given the conditions:
For GARCH (1,1), the long-run variance is:
Since current variance is above long-run variance, the GARCH model will forecast a variance that reverts toward the long-run mean. This mean-reverting property causes GARCH to forecast lower volatility than EWMA when current volatility is high.
EWMA has no mean-reversion property - it simply weights past observations. When current volatility is above average, EWMA will forecast volatility that remains relatively high, while GARCH will forecast volatility that reverts toward the long-run mean.
Therefore, GARCH (1,1) will forecast lower day n volatility than EWMA under these conditions.
Ultimate access to all questions.
The exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) and the generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (GARCH) are two well-recognized volatility models. Suppose we have an EWMA and a GARCH (1, 1). Both have the same parameter attached on the , and . Further assume that is currently above the long-run variance, which model will forecast a lower day volatility?
A
The EWMA model.
B
The GARCH (1, 1) model.
C
The forecast is the same for both models.
D
Further information is required in order to make the comparison.
No comments yet.