
Explanation:
The delta-normal approach uses a linear approximation of option price changes based on delta (the first derivative of option price with respect to the underlying asset price). This approximation works best when the option is at-the-money because:
$35) have delta close to 1.0, but the approximation may not capture gamma effects well$45 and $50) have delta close to 0, and the linear approximation becomes increasingly inaccurate due to significant gamma effectsWith the current spot price of $40:
$35: Deep in-the-money (delta ≈ 0.95-1.0)$40: At-the-money (delta ≈ 0.5)$45: Out-of-the-money (delta ≈ 0.05-0.2)$50: Deep out-of-the-money (delta ≈ 0.01-0.05)The at-the-money call option (strike $40) will have the delta-normal ES closest to the true ES because the linear approximation is most accurate for options that are not too far from at-the-money.
Ultimate access to all questions.
Kevin, FRM, is a risk manager in the local bank's derivatives trading desk. He is currently adopting a delta-normal approach to calculate the expected shortfall for various option positions. Specifically, the trading desk has positions in the call option on stock XYZ with strike prices $35, $40, $45, and $50. Given that the current spot price of stock XYZ is $40, which position's delta-normal ES will be the closest to the true ES?
A
The call option with a strike price of $35.
B
The call option with a strike price of $40.
C
The call option with a strike price of $45.
D
The call option with a strike price of $50.
No comments yet.