
Answer-first summary for fast verification
Answer: Spearman's rank correlation
## Explanation **Spearman's rank correlation** is the most appropriate statistical measure in this scenario because: - **Ordinal Data**: Credit ratings are ordinal categorical data (they have a natural order: Rating 1 > Rating 2 > Rating 3 > Rating 4) - **Rank-Based**: Spearman's correlation measures the strength and direction of association between two ranked variables - **Non-Parametric**: It doesn't assume normal distribution of the data - **Monotonic Relationships**: It detects whether the relationship between variables is monotonic (consistently increasing or decreasing) **Why other options are less appropriate:** - **Pearson correlation**: Assumes interval data and linear relationships, which doesn't apply well to ordinal categorical data - **Kendall's tau**: Also measures rank correlation but is generally less powerful than Spearman's for detecting relationships - **Chi-square test**: Tests for independence but doesn't measure the strength or direction of association between ordinal variables Since the manager wants to "approximate the link" between rating categories from two agencies, Spearman's rank correlation provides the best measure of how consistently the two agencies assign similar rankings to companies.
Author: LeetQuiz .
Ultimate access to all questions.
A risk manager is in possession of credit ratings provided by two rating agencies, X and Y, for 30 companies the manager oversees. The ratings are classified into four categories:
The manager plots the rating categories from the two agencies as shown below:
[Image blocked: Corporate Ratings: Agency X vs. Agency Y]
Which of the following statistical measures could best help the manager approximate the link between rating categories from the two agencies?
A
Spearman's rank correlation
B
Pearson correlation coefficient
C
Kendall's tau
D
Chi-square test of independence
No comments yet.