
Explanation:
Statement I is correct: CART does not require specifying an initial hyperparameter like K in KNN. While CART has parameters like tree depth, it doesn't have a mandatory hyperparameter equivalent to K.
Statement II is correct: CART does not require specifying a similarity or distance measure, unlike KNN which relies on distance metrics (Euclidean, Manhattan, etc.) to find nearest neighbors.
Statement III is correct: CART provides a visual explanation through its tree structure, making it interpretable and allowing users to understand the decision path, while KNN is more of a "black box" approach.
All three statements accurately describe advantages of CART over KNN.
Ultimate access to all questions.
Which statement(s) best describe(s) the advantages of using Classification and Regression Trees (CART) instead of K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN)?
A
Statement I only.
B
Statement I only.
C
Statement III only.
D
Statements I, II and III.
No comments yet.