
Answer-first summary for fast verification
Answer: It measures how the changes in the surprise factor $k$ will affect the rate of return of security $i$.
## Explanation In the Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT) model: - **$\beta_{ik}$** represents the sensitivity or exposure of security $i$ to factor $k$ - It measures how much the security's return ($R_i$) will change in response to a unit change in the surprise component of factor $k$ ($I_k - E(I_k)$) - The surprise component $[I_k - E(I_k)]$ represents the unexpected or unanticipated movement in factor $k$ **Why D is correct:** $\beta_{ik}$ indeed measures how changes in the surprise factor $k$ (the unexpected component) will affect the rate of return of security $i$. **Why other options are incorrect:** - **A:** Incorrect - $\beta_{ik}$ measures the effect of factor $k$ on security $i$, not the effect of security $k$ on factor $I$ - **B:** Incorrect - This describes $[I_k - E(I_k)]$, which is the surprise or unexpected component of factor $k$ - **C:** Incorrect - This describes $e_i$, the idiosyncratic error term that represents security-specific risk The APT model decomposes security returns into: 1. Expected return $E(R_i)$ 2. Systematic risk components ($\beta_{ik}[I_k - E(I_k)]$) 3. Idiosyncratic risk ($e_i$)
Author: LeetQuiz .
Ultimate access to all questions.
A risk analyst at a bank is explaining to an intern the use of the Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT) in estimating the expected return of a security. The risk analyst uses the following APT formula in the discussion:
Which of the following is a correct interpretation of ?
A
It is a coefficient measuring the effect of changes in the rate of return of security on the expected value of factor .
B
It measures the difference between the observed and expected values of factor .
C
It measures the idiosyncratic random shock to the price of security which has a mean of zero.
D
It measures how the changes in the surprise factor will affect the rate of return of security .
No comments yet.