
Explanation:
The GARCH (1,1) model formula is: σₙ² = γVₗ + αrₙ₋₁² + βσₙ₋₁²
Given data:
Step 1: Calculate previous volatility Previous volatility (σₙ₋₁) = √(σₙ₋₁²) = √(0.0009) = 0.03 (or 3%)
Step 2: Analyze the components
Step 3: Determine the change Since rₙ₋₁² = σₙ₋₁², the squared return term (αrₙ₋₁²) does not change the volatility estimate from the previous level. However, the long-run average variance rate (Vₗ = 0.0001) corresponds to a lower volatility (1%) than the previous volatility (3%), so this component pulls the current volatility estimate downward.
Therefore, the volatility estimate decreased due to the effect of the long-run average variance rate.
Why other options are incorrect:
Ultimate access to all questions.
No comments yet.
A risk analyst is interpreting the results derived from applying a GARCH (1,1) model for estimating the current trading day's price volatility of a stock. Selected inputs to the model are provided below:
Assuming α, β, and γ are held constant, how did the price volatility estimate calculated using GARCH (1,1) change from the previous day's value to the current day's value?
A
The estimate increased due to the effect of the previous trading day's return.
B
The estimate decreased due to the effect of the previous trading day's return.
C
The estimate increased due to the effect of the long-run average variance rate.
D
The estimate decreased due to the effect of the long-run average variance rate.