
Answer-first summary for fast verification
Answer: Amazon QuickSight
## Explanation **Amazon QuickSight** is the correct choice because: - **Purpose-built for BI**: Amazon QuickSight is specifically designed for business intelligence and data visualization - **Interactive dashboards**: It allows creation of interactive dashboards with drill-down capabilities - **Pay-per-session pricing**: QuickSight uses a pay-per-session model with no upfront costs or long-term commitments - **Integration with Redshift**: It seamlessly integrates with Amazon Redshift for direct data analysis - **Cost-effective**: The pay-per-session model means you only pay when users actually access the dashboards **Why not the others**: - **Amazon CloudWatch**: Primarily for monitoring AWS resources and applications, not for business intelligence dashboards - **AWS Health Dashboard**: Shows AWS service health and personal account health, not for custom business intelligence - **AWS Service Catalog**: Manages approved IT services, not for data visualization or dashboards Amazon QuickSight's pay-per-session pricing model perfectly matches the requirement of no upfront costs while providing the interactive dashboard capabilities needed for business intelligence solutions.
Author: Ritesh Yadav
Ultimate access to all questions.
A company is building a business intelligence solution that uses Amazon Redshift. The company wants to use an AWS service to create interactive dashboards and not pay any upfront costs for it.
Which service should the company use?
A
Amazon CloudWatch
B
AWS Health Dashboard
C
AWS Service Catalog
D
Amazon QuickSight
No comments yet.