AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner

Get started today

Ultimate access to all questions.

A company is building a business intelligence solution that uses Amazon Redshift. The company wants to use an AWS service to create interactive dashboards and not pay any upfront costs for it.

Which service should the company use?

Real Exam

Community

RRitesh

Explanation:

Explanation

Amazon QuickSight is the correct choice because:

Purpose-built for BI: Amazon QuickSight is specifically designed for business intelligence and data visualization
Interactive dashboards: It allows creation of interactive dashboards with drill-down capabilities
Pay-per-session pricing: QuickSight uses a pay-per-session model with no upfront costs or long-term commitments
Integration with Redshift: It seamlessly integrates with Amazon Redshift for direct data analysis
Cost-effective: The pay-per-session model means you only pay when users actually access the dashboards

Why not the others:

Amazon CloudWatch: Primarily for monitoring AWS resources and applications, not for business intelligence dashboards
AWS Health Dashboard: Shows AWS service health and personal account health, not for custom business intelligence
AWS Service Catalog: Manages approved IT services, not for data visualization or dashboards

Amazon QuickSight's pay-per-session pricing model perfectly matches the requirement of no upfront costs while providing the interactive dashboard capabilities needed for business intelligence solutions.

Powered ByGPT-5

Comments

Loading comments...