Explanation
Global reach is the correct answer because:
- AWS Regions are physical locations around the world where AWS has data centers
- By deploying applications across multiple AWS Regions, companies can serve users in different geographic locations with lower latency and higher availability
- This provides global coverage and improves application performance for international users
- The other options don't directly relate to geographic distribution:
- Pay-as-you-go pricing: Refers to the billing model where you only pay for what you use
- Capacity forecasting: Involves predicting resource needs to avoid over-provisioning
- Economies of scale: Refers to cost advantages that come from AWS's large-scale operations
Using AWS Regions specifically addresses the ability to serve users globally, making "Global reach" the most appropriate advantage in this scenario.