
Answer-first summary for fast verification
Answer: Amazon FSx for Windows File Server
## Explanation Amazon FSx for Windows File Server is the correct choice because: - **Native Microsoft Support**: It is specifically designed to support Microsoft workloads and file systems natively - **SMB Protocol Support**: It fully supports the Server Message Block (SMB) protocol, which is essential for Windows file sharing - **Fully Managed**: AWS manages the underlying infrastructure, patching, backups, and maintenance - **Windows-Compatible Features**: Includes features like Active Directory integration, Distributed File System (DFS), and Windows permissions ### Why not the other options: - **Amazon EFS**: Primarily designed for Linux workloads and uses NFS protocol, not SMB - **Amazon FSx for Lustre**: Optimized for high-performance computing and uses different protocols, not designed for Windows workloads - **Amazon EBS**: Block storage service that requires you to manage the file system yourself, not a fully managed file server Amazon FSx for Windows File Server provides a fully managed, native Windows file system experience with built-in SMB protocol support, making it ideal for Microsoft workloads.
Author: Ritesh Yadav
Ultimate access to all questions.
A company needs a fully managed file server that natively supports Microsoft workloads and file systems. The file server must also support the SMB protocol.
Which AWS service should the company use to meet these requirements?
A
Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS)
B
Amazon FSx for Lustre
C
Amazon FSx for Windows File Server
D
Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS)
No comments yet.