AWS Certified Cloud Practitioner

Get started today

Ultimate access to all questions.

Explanation:

Amazon S3 is the correct choice because:

Durable storage: S3 provides 99.999999999% (11 nines) durability for objects stored
Static content optimization: S3 is specifically designed for storing and serving static content like images, videos, CSS, JavaScript files
Lower CPU utilization: By offloading static content to S3, the web tier EC2 instances don't need to handle file serving, reducing CPU load
Cost-effective: S3 is more cost-effective for static storage compared to EBS volumes
High availability: S3 is highly available across multiple Availability Zones

Amazon EBS volumes are block storage attached to EC2 instances, EC2 instance store is ephemeral storage, and Amazon RDS is for databases - none are optimized for static content serving like S3.

Explanation:

Amazon S3 is the correct choice because:

Durable storage: S3 provides 99.999999999% (11 nines) durability for objects stored
Static content optimization: S3 is specifically designed for storing and serving static content like images, videos, CSS, JavaScript files
Lower CPU utilization: By offloading static content to S3, the web tier EC2 instances don't need to handle file serving, reducing CPU load
Cost-effective: S3 is more cost-effective for static storage compared to EBS volumes
High availability: S3 is highly available across multiple Availability Zones

Amazon EBS volumes are block storage attached to EC2 instances, EC2 instance store is ephemeral storage, and Amazon RDS is for databases - none are optimized for static content serving like S3.

Comments (0)

No comments yet.

A company is deploying a two-tier, highly available web application to AWS. Which service provides durable storage for static content while utilizing lower Overall CPU resources for the web tier?

Exam-Like

Community

RRitesh

Amazon EBS volume

25.0%

Amazon S3

50.0%

Amazon EC2 instance store

12.5%

Amazon RDS instance

12.5%